Review of a sports-related expert report

Checking the method, source data and reasoning behind findings in an examination of the training process, equipment or session conditions.

When it is needed

When a report contains a disputed explanation of an event, conflicts with materials or needs assessment by a specialist in the relevant field.

What we examine

  • The full expert or specialist report.
  • Calculations, photographic tables, recordings and other appendices.
  • Programmes, technical documents and source examination materials.

Materials to prepare

  • The report with all appendices and original questions.
  • Available materials that the author had.
  • Original recordings, programme and equipment documents relevant to the dispute.
  • An observations list identifying pages and circumstances to be checked.

Sample questions

  • Does the examination's specialism match the questions and objects supplied?
  • Are the source materials sufficient for the findings made?
  • Were the sport, training stage, programme type and significant session conditions considered?
  • Are methods for checking key assertions and limitations of the data used shown?
  • Which findings are supported by the results and which require clarification or further examination?

Build a set of questions →

How the work is carried out

  1. We will identify the report's specialism and the specialist knowledge needed.
  2. We will check source data, method applicability and the reasoning behind key findings.
  3. We will prepare a reasoned review and questions to clarify disputed statements.

Result

A written review substantively analysing particular passages, supporting its observations and defining the limits of checking.

What affects the conclusions

A multidisciplinary report may require several relevant specialists. A review does not guarantee a change to a judicial or sporting decision.

Frequently asked questions

Can the same specialist check the medical section?

Medical questions require the appropriate medical specialism. The checking scope is agreed separately; a pedagogical examination does not replace a medical one.

What if no clear error is found?

That is also a checking result. The reviewer identifies supported statements and limitations and formulates observations only where substantive grounds exist.

Let’s discuss your task

Describe the situation and the materials you have. We will agree the questions, scope of work and format of the result.

Send an enquiry ↗